Providers / Exolix
Exolix, measured
Every provider on this site is asked the same question at the same moment — same pair, same amount, same second — and every answer is kept. Exolix has been asked 3,292 times. What follows is what it did, not what it says about itself.
The record
1,479 prices from 3,292 requests.
1,479 prices from 2,546 requests on pairs it has answered at least once. The gap to the figure above is pairs it does not trade.
Mean gap to the best quote in the same fan-out, over 1,479 fan-outs where at least two providers answered.
Paid the most of everyone who answered, in 43 of 1,479 fan-outs.
Distinct currency pairs it has ever returned a price for here.
The most recent fan-out that got a price out of it.
A rate is printed only above thirty samples; below that it reads as a dash rather than as a number, and the sample size is beside every figure so a reader can disagree. “Behind the best price” is the comparable one: it is measured inside a single fan-out, against the same competitors at the same second, so it needs no market benchmark and cannot be flattered by a wrong one.
It does not price independently
Exolix and SageSwap return prices that move together far more closely than competing desks do.
- vs SageSwap: 0.70 bp across 1,026 fan-outs on 15 pairs
This is not an ownership claim and nothing here establishes one. It says the prices come from the same book, which is a measurable thing and a different thing. What it means for a reader is narrower and more useful than it sounds: choosing between these names is not choosing between quotes, so a comparison that treats them as independent options is overstating how much choice it offers.
Identity checks
D — Can demand identification, or hold funds, part-way through a transfer it has already accepted., scored 5 of 10.
An unresolved 2026 vulnerability exposed around 355,000 swaps — deposit and withdrawal addresses paired, with hashes and amounts. This site will not route a Monero hop through them.
Checked by the rating service itself, reviewed 13 September 2026. Source: kycnot.me. Not this site's assessment, and reproduced because the reader should be able to check it rather than take it from here.
Their own terms
“If you refuse to provide such information, we are not responsible for ensuring the refund or completion.”
Exolix's own terms, read 1 October 2026. Quoted exactly rather than summarised, because a summary of a clause is an opinion about it.
What has already happened
An unresolved breach exposed about $39.5M of swap history across roughly 355,000 transactions — deposit and withdrawal addresses, transaction hashes, amounts and timestamps — through unscoped API keys. That is the exact source-to-destination pairing this site exists to break, published by the provider rather than inferred by an observer.
Invalid Date · source. Worth more than any clause: terms describe intent, an incident describes behaviour under pressure.
Measured ahead of it
- Changelly — 0.19% behind the best, over 4,440 fan-outs
- Mistex — 0.28% behind the best, over 2,032 fan-outs
- swapgate — 0.38% behind the best, over 969 fan-outs
Ranked on the same figure over the same record. It is an average and not a promise: the cheapest provider changes with the pair, the direction and the amount, which is the whole reason this site prices all of them at once rather than recommending one.
Price Exolix against every other provider right now, for your own pair and amount.
No account, no email, and nothing held: your browser pays the provider's deposit address and the provider pays yours.
Compare liveNothing here is an endorsement or a partnership, and this site is not paid to rank anybody above anybody. The figures come from the measurement record, which is published free and in full. See every provider side by side or what each one's terms permit.